RJ - EDITORIAL: Another mass transit boondoggle
Despite the best of intentions, nobody gets on the bus
=========
WRONG WRONG WRONG

Millions ride trains
THAT was what he was talking about.

The RJ HATE MACHINE pumps out more BS.

The president's plan identifies 10 potential high-speed intercity corridors for federal funding, including California, the Pacific Northwest, the Midwest, the Southeast, the Gulf Coast, Pennsylvania, Florida, New York and New England.

LVKen7@Gmail.com

BUT NOT - Ken's - FREE SPEECH.

BUT NOT - Ken's -  FREE SPEECH.

The RJ won't post this comment from me

WHY ISN'T THE RJ DISCUSSING STONA -
A Sales Tax on Advertising?
It would give NV, at least,
$300 MILLION a year.

WHY ISN'T THE RJ TALKING ABOUT THAT???

"Don't wait to the last minute to unveil a "plan." Get it together now and get it into the light of day for public scrutiny. This is no time for business as usual, dead-of-night, back-room deals." - Sherman

LVKen7@Gmail.com

Tell me this about the Law
It is Illegal for Cargo ships to carry weapons
to defend themselves.

It is Illegal to Hijack Ship.

So, if it is OK for Pirates to hijack
WHY DON'T CARGO SHIP ARM THEMSELVES?
===
The RJ KNOW
that a Sales Tax on Advertising = STONA
would get NV,
at least $300 Milion per year
of added tax revenue.
THEN WHY ARE THEY NOT TALKING ABOUT IT?
 
LVKen7@Gmail.com

NICE TRY - TO MOLLY AT THE RJ

On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 3:52 PM, <MBall@reviewjournal.com> wrote:

Dear Mr. Jarvis,
Thank you for your feedback. Did you read the entire article? It wasn't just about salons, but about the entire service sector, with a salon used as just one example. Also in the article, it's pointed out that there are differing views about whether it's wise to tax business-to-business services, such as advertising.

YES, I did read the entire article.

I also did a word search
and THE WORD = ADVERTISING
WAS NOT IN THE ARTICLE.

Many economists believe it's better to tax services purchased by consumers.

Did you leave out the word = NOT
as in -

Many economists believe it's better NOT to tax services purchased by consumers.

 

 

Perhaps for this reason, there are only five states that tax any type of advertising.

The REAL reason "only five states that tax any type of advertising."
is because the ONLY COST WOULD BE TO THE MEIDA.

And the Media -
especially the RJ -
is greedy and cares NOTHING ABOUT
WHAT IS BEST FOR LV OR NV.

For example,
their editorial yesterday
DEFENDING SPAMMERS.

Sales Tax on Advertising - STONA
Would give give NV
as least
$300 MILLION
a year

$300 Million of NEEDED TAX REVENUE.

But it was a NICE TRY anyway.

Thanks

KJ

LVKen7@Gmail.com

"The reformers can't figure out why the public is so dumb they can't see that letting the government finance all the election campaigns is the only way to eliminate corruption in the system."

WRONG!!!

The ONLY way to get the $$$$
out of politics is
to USE THE INTERNET TO CAMPAIGN.
 
LVKen7@Gmail.com