Dear Mr. Jarvis,
Thank you for your feedback. Did you read the entire article? It wasn't just about salons, but about the entire service sector, with a salon used as just one example. Also in the article, it's pointed out that there are differing views about whether it's wise to tax business-to-business services, such as advertising.
YES, I did read the entire article.
I also did a word search
and THE WORD = ADVERTISING
WAS NOT IN THE ARTICLE.
Many economists believe it's better to tax services purchased by consumers.
Did you leave out the word = NOT
as in -
Many economists believe it's better NOT to tax services purchased by consumers.
Perhaps for this reason, there are only five states that tax any type of advertising.
The REAL reason "only five states that tax any type of advertising."
is because the ONLY COST WOULD BE TO THE MEIDA.
And the Media -
especially the RJ -
is greedy and cares NOTHING ABOUT
WHAT IS BEST FOR LV OR NV.
For example,
their editorial yesterday
DEFENDING SPAMMERS.
Sales Tax on Advertising - STONA
Would give give NV
as least
$300 MILLION
a year
$300 Million of NEEDED TAX REVENUE.
But it was a NICE TRY anyway.
Thanks
KJ
LVKen7@Gmail.com
No comments:
Post a Comment