The RJ -
who is always crowing about
Freedom of Speeh
and the Constitution
HAVE STOPPED POSTING MY COMMENT
THAT I POST AFTER AN EDITORIAL OR ARTICLE.
It is FRUSTRATING, BUT .............
LVKen7@Gmail.com
WHY is the RJ ANTI-LVegas?
Sunday, July 19, 2009
Saturday, July 18, 2009
Friday, July 17, 2009
HYPOCRITES
THEY have "CRITICIZED"
the firefighters for not lowering their pay,
BUT THE RJ WILL NOT
LET THE PUBLIC KNOW
IF THERE WAS A SALES TAX ON ADVERTISING,
NV WOULD GET, AT LEAST, $300 MILLION PER YEAR,
and the ONLY cost, other that to the media,
would be fewer ads.
FEWER ADS WOULD BE A GOOD THING.
But, they won't talk about it.
Hypocrites.
Hypocrites.
Hypocrites.
LVKen7@Gmail.com
the firefighters for not lowering their pay,
BUT THE RJ WILL NOT
LET THE PUBLIC KNOW
IF THERE WAS A SALES TAX ON ADVERTISING,
NV WOULD GET, AT LEAST, $300 MILLION PER YEAR,
and the ONLY cost, other that to the media,
would be fewer ads.
FEWER ADS WOULD BE A GOOD THING.
But, they won't talk about it.
Hypocrites.
Hypocrites.
Hypocrites.
LVKen7@Gmail.com
Monday, July 6, 2009
Wednesday, June 17, 2009
"U.S. prosecutors narrow subpoena information on two R-J Web site posts sought "
6-17-09
"U.S. prosecutors narrow subpoena
information on two R-J Web site posts sought "
It has always been the RJ Policy
to allow posters on the eForum
to post anything they wanted.
Several time, post - that I should be killed
or beat up appeared,
and I reported them to BOTH Mitchell and the Webmaster
and the way they handled it was
TO KICK ME OFF THE FORUM.
To post on the forum or comment on an article
ALL must AGREE to Rules,
but the RULES ARE NOT ENFORCED
and THAT IS THE PROBLEM.
"If you see a comment that violates our policy,
please notify the Online staff. "
Even their - Terms & Conditions
makes NO sense
===
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors.
The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication
nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.
Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours.
===
I call that the
RJ - first they say they will
and then they say they won't policy.
===
Weekly, Mitchell, and Sherman and others run articles
on - THE RJs INTERPRETATION OF THE CONSTITUTION
AND THEIR BELIEF IN FREE SPEECH,
but, then they don't abide by it.
LVKen7@Gmail.com
"U.S. prosecutors narrow subpoena
information on two R-J Web site posts sought "
It has always been the RJ Policy
to allow posters on the eForum
to post anything they wanted.
Several time, post - that I should be killed
or beat up appeared,
and I reported them to BOTH Mitchell and the Webmaster
and the way they handled it was
TO KICK ME OFF THE FORUM.
To post on the forum or comment on an article
ALL must AGREE to Rules,
but the RULES ARE NOT ENFORCED
and THAT IS THE PROBLEM.
"If you see a comment that violates our policy,
please notify the Online staff. "
Even their - Terms & Conditions
makes NO sense
===
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors.
The reviewjournal.com does not review comments before publication
nor guarantee their accuracy. By publishing a comment here you agree to abide by the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the web editor.
Some comments may not display immediately due to an automatic filter. These comments will be reviewed within 48 hours.
===
I call that the
RJ - first they say they will
and then they say they won't policy.
===
Weekly, Mitchell, and Sherman and others run articles
on - THE RJs INTERPRETATION OF THE CONSTITUTION
AND THEIR BELIEF IN FREE SPEECH,
but, then they don't abide by it.
LVKen7@Gmail.com
Sunday, May 3, 2009
Saturday, May 2, 2009
UnIONS WIN AGAIN
ANTI-UNION RJ
REPORTS IT BACKWARDS
Adelson lost
Union members CAN use the sidewalks in front
of the Venetion.
Stutz STARTS his BS report as -
NLRB "ends the 10 year old case"
YES,
because the UNION WON.
LVKen7@Gmail.com
REPORTS IT BACKWARDS
Adelson lost
Union members CAN use the sidewalks in front
of the Venetion.
Stutz STARTS his BS report as -
NLRB "ends the 10 year old case"
YES,
because the UNION WON.
LVKen7@Gmail.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
